Shoulder replacements promise increased functionality in the shoulder and arm area and reduced pain. These surgically implanted devices are very promising for those who have limited shoulder functions because of injury and complications. An example of shoulder replacements is the Biomet Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder, which promises to restore arm movement for those who have sustained arthritis.
This device, however, has started to be recalled because its fracture rate is higher than what is labelled, resulting into damages on the side of the patient. Those who have the Biomet Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder may sustain injuries and infections, corrective surgeries, additional medical costs, and lost time at work, because of the defects present in the shoulder replacement. This is the best example on how shoulder replacements can pose significant danger toward the patients.
Possible Issues with Shoulder Replacements
Shoulder replacements can be dangerous because of numerous reasons. These reasons may be on the side of the patient, the medical staff, or the device itself. On the side of the patient, a possible issue is allergic reaction to the cement used in the medical device.
But the worst reasons are those that involve the medical staff and the device itself, since the patient will be the one suffering because of the negligence of another party. It can even be argued that the allergic reaction to cement is the medical staff’s fault, because of the staff’s inability or failure to foresee such a risk. According to the website of the shoulder replacement lawyers of Williams Kherkher, patients who have sustained additional injury or have had corrective surgery because of a flawed shoulder replacement device may have legal options to pursue.
There are several issues with shoulder replacements that can be associated with the medical staff and the device itself, such as the following:
Bone, nerve, or tissue damage
Prosthetic misalignment or loosening